At the moment, the admin reinstatement template lists, as one of the reasons for losing admin status, "c. I quit or resigned (Yes or No) If Yes, explain why you didn't follow the policy to simply go inactive rather than quit or resign." I propose replacing the second sentence. I think that resignations (particularly the drama-free ones) are perfectly honourable (and I think the no resignations policy was repealed when Mark was owner anyway). With that in mind, I propose replacing the second sentence with "If Yes, please post a link to your resignation thread (if available)." so that anything relevant from the resignation thread can be reviewed. I then think we should change question 5 so people who resign don't have to answer the question about what they have done to warrant reinstatement.
Resignations and Admin Reinstatement
-
-
vouch
-
Vouch
-
What was historically meant by a "resignation" was more accurately described as a ragequit, which is obviously not very honorable by today's standards either. I agree that there is no reason to treat drama-free resignations different than inactivity notifications, though.
-
vouch
-
Vouch
-
Vouch
-
vouch
i lowkey thought this post was a reinstatement
-
Vouch
-
Vouch
-
Agreed with Steven.
Vouch.
-
Approved, kind of a no-brainer since resignations and their implications have changed significantly as Steven put. I'll also add an option of a ragequit type resignation so that the two are still treated differently.
-
wild1145
July 17, 2022 at 2:17 PM Moved the thread from forum Imported from Flarum to forum Freedom Game-mode. -
wild1145
July 17, 2022 at 4:54 PM Moved the thread from forum Freedom Game-mode to forum Approved.