@Darth#11255
QuoteIf every republican votes against it, then yes, that's how it is.
Have you taken a political science 101 course? I'm assuming you have, but your "that's how it is" comment seems to speak to the contrary. Of course "that's how it is" systemtically, but taking the context of this conversation into account, it's obvious that we're not talking systemics, but politics.
QuoteUnity among the people, and the first major legislation was a bill that has support from the majority of americans.
This is false. He has stated a multitude of times that Republican and Democratic lawmakers should come together and has met with plenty on structuring (e.g.) the stimulus plan.
QuoteIn theory a good idea, but if you piss off Manchin too much he could resign, a republican would be appointed to his seat,
Do you honestly believe this? That a sitting senator would just resign, because the sitting President "forces" him to vote for a certain piece of legislation or he will actively campaign against him. When you get a job, are you going to resign because you disagree with your boss? This, while also assuming that a republican would indeed be appointed to his seat, which is nowhere near a certainty.
QuoteBecause you cannot strongarm someone who has all the leverage
Except Biden clearly has the political leverage in that his favourability far outweighs a (fairly disliked) senator like Manchin. You speak of these vague notions, but then continue to back them up with circular reasoning.
QuoteAmericans needed help now,
That "now" was 2 months ago when Biden claimed checks would go out "immediatedly".
Quoteand while not ideal, it's better in the long run to make concessions and live to fight another day than risk stalling the bill further.
That's how you shift the overton window further right by conceeding. This was an example under Bill Clinton, Obama and is already an example under Biden. Again, Obamacare was originally a Republican-plan. So no, it is not "better in the long run" and there is more than ample evidence to the contrary.
Quotethe Republicans will oppose anything that Democrats want out of spite"
I would assert that this is a lazy interpretation of the these events for the last 10-20 years. If you can gain more political power by simply opposing legislation proposed by the opposing party, then the obvious choice is to do so, and that's what the GOP has been doing thus far, and the Democrats have continued to try and meet them half-way. If two parties are pulling a rope, but then one of the parties decides to meet the other party halfway down the rope, then the other party keeps (gets) more rope.
Biden is just as bad as Manchin when it comes to "bipartisanship". There is next to nothing good that has come out of bipartisanship.
QuoteStill, Biden clearly learned his lesson from his VP days. When the Democrats were crafting the stimulus bill to ease the recession, they spent months "working" with Republicans on a deal, who got the bill heavily watered down, only to vote against it anyways.
You're essentially agreeing with my point above.
ite, missa est: Biden keeps backtracking, which was to be expected of him.